An
argument works the same way. When constructing an argument, it’s tempting to
fall into logical traps that may seem sensible at first. However, when viewed
closely, this kind of reasoning doesn’t make any real logical sense. These are
called logical fallacies, and they should be avoided in formal writing.
There
are many different kinds of logical fallacies. Some of these fallacies are more
noticeable than others. Some may feel emotionally true, but aren’t logically
valid. Some may even have valid uses, but not in the context that you’re
writing for. However, all of them can undermine the strength of your argument.
While there are too many different fallacies to cover them all in this entry, I’ll
mention two of the more common ones.
Circular reasoning: A claim that repeats itself as an
attempt to justify the claim. For example, avoid arguments such as “circular
reasoning is bad because it’s circular.” This doesn’t prove anything to the
reader. In contrast, the claim that “circular reasoning is bad because it
recycles ideas without explaining them” is a valid approach. Always support an
argument with new ideas and logical explanation.
Slippery slope: A claim that suggests that a
specific chain of events will happen
if a specific action is taken. This is a tempting fallacy because this is also
the premise of the cause-effect essay. However, it becomes a slippery slope
when the argument doesn’t prove how and why the chain of events would take
place. If you plan to use a cause-effect argument, it must be explained to be
valid.
The
best way to avoid fallacious arguments is by carefully reviewing the argument
you’re making. While a claim might seem to make sense, it might fall apart
under careful inspection. Make certain you’re arguing with valid and logical
points, and beware the tempting logical traps.
See
you next time the breeze is cool, the sun is up, and the waves roll into view!
‘Til then, hang ten!